About 640 minutes
The Awkward Age — A Closer Reading
Historical Social Novels
147,030 recorded words. 10 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #7433A Mummer's Wife — A Reader’s Guide can be approached with a clearer sense of reading commitment from its source measurements: 149,297 words, 10 hr 50 min estimated reading time, and 12 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 20.1 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Adultery -- Fiction,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Explore this collection
These alternatives are selected using recorded categories and estimated reading time.
About 640 minutes
Historical Social Novels
147,030 recorded words. 10 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #7433About 704 minutes
Historical Social Novels
161,811 recorded words. 54 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #6058About 574 minutes
Historical Social Novels
131,820 recorded words. 76 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #7059Search stored excerpts and compare books → Choose by your preferences →
Choices use stored catalog measurements. Estimates vary with reading speed. A shared category is a catalog label, not a claim that two books have the same argument or literary quality.
Search reads excerpt text stored with this catalog and links to its associated Gutenberg record. The connection is stored in the site database; this tool does not recheck that every excerpt is word-for-word identical to that external record. Excerpt search does not cover every chapter and does not verify historical publication dates.
Catalog snapshot checked: 2026-09-25. Coverage: 95 public books, 95 available source excerpts.
Read the complete public-domain text at its original source.
Read on Project GutenbergGeorge Moore's A Mummer's Wife opens with a dedication to Robert Ross that is itself a miniature essay on the art of criticism, setting a tone of reflective, sometimes combative self-examination. The novel then moves into a world where the rhythms of Staffordshire life are disrupted by the arrival of a touring theatre company. Moore's prose shifts between the claustrophobic detail of a provincial household and the brittle, competitive energy of backstage banter. The excerpts show a writer attentive to the precise mechanics of social performance—whether in the drawing-room or the dressing-room—and to the way language itself becomes a weapon or a shield.
The early sections of the novel are built from dense, circumstantial observation. Moore lingers on the material textures of domestic life: the furniture, the routines, the small economies of a household. This is not mere scene-setting; it establishes a baseline of constraint against which the theatre's gaudy freedoms will be measured. The narrator's eye is clinical, almost anthropological, noting how a character's speech or gesture betrays a class position or a hidden desire. The pace is deliberate, even slow, as if the prose itself were trapped in the same narrow rooms as the characters.
Yet within this apparent stasis, Moore introduces small, telling disruptions. A phrase overheard, a glance held too long—these are the fault lines along which the narrative will later crack open. The reader is invited to watch for the moment when the accumulated weight of the ordinary becomes unbearable.
Once the narrative moves into the theatre, the prose accelerates and fragments. Moore captures the overlapping, competitive talk of the company: the quick retorts, the stage whispers, the calculated laughter. The excerpt of the 'fat head' scene shows a playwright's ear for comic timing, but also a novelist's awareness of how performance is always a negotiation of power. The girls' attempt to 'queer' Kate's scene is described with a precise, almost technical vocabulary: 'mugged', 'queering the scene', 'working together'. The language of the theatre becomes a second dialect, one that the protagonist must learn or be destroyed by.
Moore does not romanticize this world. The camaraderie is laced with cruelty; the applause is fickle. The manager Dick's intervention is a reminder that even the illusion of spontaneity is stage-managed. The pace here is breathless, the paragraphs shorter, the dialogue almost stenographic. This is a world where every word is a move in a game.
Throughout the excerpts, Moore blurs the line between theatrical performance and social performance. The characters are always acting, even when they think they are being themselves. Dolly Goddard's mockery of divorce cases is a performance of innocence that is also a threat; Kate's stage fright is a collapse of one kind of performance into another. The novel seems to ask: what happens when the mask becomes the face?
The narrative voice itself shifts register, moving from the ironic detachment of the dedication to the raw, almost documentary style of the theatre scenes. This is not a stable omniscience but a restless, adapting presence. Moore's prose is at its most incisive when it captures the gap between what characters say and what they mean—a gap that is both the source of comedy and the seed of tragedy. The reader is left to judge how much of the protagonist's fate is scripted and how much is improvised.
Readers should attend to the novel's modulations of tempo: the slow, almost suffocating accumulation of domestic detail; the rapid-fire exchanges of the theatre; the sudden, jarring silences. Moore's language is never decorative; it is always doing work—exposing a character's vulnerability, marking a shift in power, or registering the pressure of an unspoken thought. The novel rewards a patient, attentive reading that listens for the cracks in the performance.
I read A Mummer's Wife on a quiet afternoon, and found myself thinking of the way performance can hollow out a person. The heroine’s shifting roles reminded me, strangely, of The Man of Feeling — Background and Themes, where sentiment itself becomes a mask. Both books circle that fragile line between what we feel and what we show, and the loneliness of crossing it. A familiar ache, really.
Your answers remain private and are stored only in this browser.